Guideline-supported
Clinical guidelines explicitly include EMDR for this indication and population.
An honest comparison of where clinical guidelines include EMDR, where evidence depends on a PTSD diagnosis, and where it remains preliminary or is not first-line.
We separate an explicit recommendation for an indication from PTSD-based extrapolation, emerging research and uses without first-line support. A row may change when new guidance or reviews are published.
Clinical guidelines explicitly include EMDR for this indication and population.
Support mainly comes from PTSD treatment; the event or population is not an indication by itself.
Promising condition-specific studies exist, but they remain few, small, varied or insufficient for a firm recommendation.
EMDR is not an established primary treatment for this concern, or direct evidence is insufficient compared with recommended alternatives.
31 of 31 topics
WHO and NICE include EMDR among psychological interventions for adults with PTSD, with conditions around timing, trauma type, training and delivery.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →NICE allows EMDR to be considered from ages 7 to 17 when trauma-focused CBT is not engaged with or does not produce a response.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Trauma-focused evidence may apply where PTSD is present, while repeated histories commonly require individualized formulation, preparation and pacing.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR may target early traumatic memories within a clinically formulated plan for PTSD or related difficulties.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Where PTSD is present, trauma-treatment recommendations including EMDR may be relevant.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR may be considered for birth-related PTSD within coordinated perinatal care.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →PTSD evidence may apply when illness, procedures, hospitalization or intensive care have been traumatic.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR has been studied for PTSD in veterans, while recommendations and outcomes may differ by trauma type and healthcare system.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Trials and reviews exist for anxiety symptoms and disorders, but populations and comparators are heterogeneous.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Small condition-specific research exists for EMDR in panic, without displacing first-line recommendations.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Some studies evaluate EMDR for depression, particularly alongside traumatic experiences.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Recent publications examine EMDR for prolonged grief, while the condition-specific base remains smaller than for grief-focused treatments.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Recent reviews report possible signals for EMDR as an adjunct for some people with persistent pain.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Recent meta-analyses examine EMDR as an adjunct for craving and substance-use disorders.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Sleep may improve when underlying PTSD is treated, with small studies also examining nightmares and other concerns.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Research examines EMDR added to care when people with BPD also have PTSD or traumatic memories.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Trials and a 2025 review provide promising signals for treating co-occurring PTSD in some people with psychosis.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Case series and pilot studies suggest feasibility for PTSD after traumatic brain injury or stroke.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →A small 2024 trial provides a preliminary signal for EMDR added to usual care in adults with suicidal ideation.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Small studies examine tests, public speaking or performance, with heterogeneous findings.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →A 2024 review found a favorable short-term signal, but trials were small and of limited quality.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR may be assessed where PTSD is present, although a 2025 meta-analysis found no significant effect at treatment end.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Reviews find favorable EMDR signals where occupational PTSD is present, with substantial variation across studies.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR may address related memories, but condition-specific evidence does not establish a primary moral-injury treatment.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Specific relational memories may be addressed, but “attachment wounds” is not an established independent indication.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR may be considered for traumatic memories or PTSD, but direct evidence for racial trauma is insufficient.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Direct evidence for EMDR in OCD is insufficient to displace recommended treatments.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR studies exist, but the evidence is small and needs comparison with condition-specific exposure-based treatment.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR may be proposed as an adjunct when trauma is present, but it is not an established primary eating-disorder treatment.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →EMDR may be adapted to treat co-occurring trauma in autistic people or people with ADHD.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →Individual EMDR may address memories of abuse, betrayal or breakup, while evidence for conjoint protocols is small.
See evidence, sources and alternatives →The classification prioritizes bodies and guidelines. Detail pages document condition-specific research and its limitations. Inclusion is not an individual recommendation.
Yes for PTSD in adults: WHO and NICE include EMDR in their recommendations, with conditions and nuance. For many other concerns evidence is smaller or EMDR is not first-line.
Not necessarily. It means condition-specific studies exist but may still be few, small, heterogeneous or insufficient for a firm recommendation.
No. Exposure to an event and a PTSD diagnosis are not equivalent. Indication depends on symptoms, functioning, assessment and preferences.
Clinical guidelines, systematic reviews and condition-specific studies are reviewed. Every row links to a detailed guide with sources and limitations.
Compare training, experience, language, format and location in a directory dedicated exclusively to EMDR.